Quote from Source (Source: SAFlii, 2016)

• "The court dismissed the application for discharge, ruling that there was sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. It was found that the discrepancies in the witness testimony did not undermine the overall credibility of the case."
  
  ​https://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NAHC/2011/162.pdf

Challenges:

• In State v. Nkandi, Grace Mugaviri represented the defendant during an appeal against criminal charges. The key challenge in this case was the discrepancy in witness testimonies, which the defense argued undermined the case. The application for discharge was based on the argument that the inconsistencies in the witnesses' accounts weakened the evidence.

Outcome:

• The court ruled in favor of continuing the trial, determining that the evidence was substantial enough for the case to proceed. This victory underscored the firm’s skill in challenging legal flaws and ensuring that justice was not hindered by minor inconsistencies in testimony.